Journal
Opinion
Unica Wealth Management
From 1 July 2026, Australia's superannuation system enters a new phase. Division 296 introduces an additional tax on superannuation earnings for individuals with large balances, changing how sophisticated investors should think about super as part of their broader wealth strategy.
For many high-net-worth Australians, this is not simply another incremental rule change. It is a structural shift that calls for proactive planning, careful modelling, and a more deliberate approach to how wealth is held across super and non-super environments.
What Division 296 Actually Does (and What It Doesn't)
Division 296 does not cap how much you can hold in super. It does not confiscate balances or impose a one-off levy.
Instead, it introduces an additional tax on a portion of superannuation earnings once an individual's Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) exceeds $3 million.
In practical terms:
Individuals with super balances above $3 million pay an additional 15% tax on the proportion of earnings attributable to the excess above $3 million.
For balances above $10 million, a further 10% tax applies to the portion of earnings attributable to amounts above that second threshold.
The tax applies to earnings, not balances.
It is a personal tax liability, even though the earnings are calculated by the super fund.
The underlying superannuation tax system remains intact. Concessional contributions tax, the 15% earnings tax in accumulation, and exempt pension earnings all continue to apply. Division 296 simply sits on top, reducing the marginal tax advantage of very large super balances.
Who Needs to Pay Attention
While the headlines focus on "the wealthy", Division 296 is not limited to ultra-high-net-worth families. In practice, it is likely to affect:
Long-term SMSF members with strong historical investment performance
Professionals and business owners approaching retirement with concentrated super balances
Couples where a reversionary pension or inheritance pushes one spouse above the threshold
Individuals with defined benefit interests valued using prescribed formulas
Investors who are not yet above $3 million, but are clearly on that trajectory
That trajectory often runs through events such as:
Inheriting a spouse's superannuation pension
Strong market performance after long periods holding growth assets
Retirement or transition-to-retirement decisions that alter balances
Defined benefit commencements or commutations
Business sales where proceeds are contributed to or retained in super
Inaction in the first year, which locks in a higher opening balance for future years
Crucially, the regime captures future growth. Even clients comfortably below the threshold today may cross it later through market returns, asset realisations, or life events.
The First Year Matters More Than Many People Realise
The first year of operation, 2026/27, has a unique feature that creates both opportunity and risk.
For that year only, the Division 296 calculation looks solely at the balance at 30 June 2027, not the higher of the opening or closing balance (as will apply from 2027/28 onwards).
This creates a narrow planning window where:
Large withdrawals, restructures, or asset sales completed before 30 June 2027 can materially reduce, or even eliminate, exposure for the first year.
Inaction can lock in a higher baseline that influences future years, even if balances are later reduced.
For SMSF trustees, this timing also interacts with the once-only option to reset asset values for Division 296 purposes as at 30 June 2026. Making, or not making, this election can carry long-term consequences that extend well beyond the first year of the regime.
Why This Is a Structural Shift, Not a Tactical Irritation
Historically, superannuation has been the dominant accumulation vehicle for successful Australians. For many, the answer to "where should I invest for the long term?" was simply "inside super".
Division 296 changes that calculus.
Super remains attractive, but no longer unrivalled, once balances are large enough. For some investors, the effective tax rate on earnings will move closer to, or in certain scenarios exceed, the outcomes available through alternative structures.
That does not mean super should be abandoned. It does mean:
The marginal dollar of investment capital deserves closer scrutiny
Concentration risk within a single tax environment becomes more relevant
Structure matters as much as asset allocation
Strategic Themes Emerging Under Division 296
Rather than reacting to the new tax, sophisticated investors are stepping back and reassessing how their wealth is structured as a whole. Some of the recurring themes we are seeing:
1. Treating super as one component, not the entire strategy. For many clients, super remains a core pillar but not the sole repository of long-term capital. Spreading investment exposure across super and non-super structures can reduce tax concentration risk and improve flexibility.
2. Greater use of alternative investment structures. Family trusts, companies, and other investment vehicles, while taxed differently, offer control, estate-planning flexibility, and in some cases comparable long-term after-tax outcomes once Division 296 is factored in.
3. Investment bonds as a complementary tool. Investment bonds are increasingly part of the conversation, particularly for surplus capital that would otherwise sit in more heavily taxed environments.
4. Managing timing and sequencing. The interaction between asset realisations, withdrawals, pensions, and life events has become more consequential. Thoughtful sequencing, particularly around the first year of Division 296, can materially influence outcomes.
5. Coordinated advice is no longer optional. Division 296 sits at the intersection of tax law, superannuation, investment strategy, and estate planning. Decisions made in isolation, without modelling and coordination, can easily create unintended consequences.
Why Proactive Advice Matters More Than Ever
Division 296 is not a tax that can be cleaned up at year end. Once balances are measured and earnings allocated, the outcome is largely locked in. The most effective strategies are forward-looking, modelled across multiple years, coordinated with accountants and other advisers, and aligned with broader family and legacy objectives.
For some investors, the right response may be relatively modest. For others, it may involve meaningful structural change. What matters is not adopting a generic solution, but arriving at a deliberate, well-reasoned strategy.
A Final Thought
Division 296 does not signal the end of superannuation as a powerful wealth vehicle. But it does mark the end of super as an unquestioned default for very large balances.
In this new environment, the investors who do best will be those who understand how the rules apply to their specific circumstances, take advantage of transitional opportunities, and use structure intentionally rather than by habit.
At UNICA Wealth, we believe this is precisely where high-quality advice adds the most value: not by reacting to change, but by helping clients navigate it with clarity and confidence.
General Advice Warning
This presentation has been prepared by Unica Wealth, an Authorised Representative of SGN Financial Pty Ltd (AFSL 490523 & ABN 40 120 395 905).
The information provided is general in nature and does not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. Before making any financial decisions, you should consider whether the information is appropriate for your circumstances and seek professional advice tailored to your situation.
While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, Unica Wealth and SGN Financial Pty Ltd do not accept any liability for any loss arising from reliance on this material.
Share
